Pucl v. union of india

Author: wtlc

August undefined, 2024

WebApr 20, 2004 · Supreme Court hearings on the right to food (PUCL vs Union of India and others, Civil Writ Petition 196 of 2001) have been held at regular intervals since April 2001. Though the judgement is still awaited, interim orders have been passed from time to time. This order is primarily on the Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS). WebParmanand Katara v. Union of India 36. PUCL v. Union of India 5 50 Leading Cases of Supreme Court of India www.discountbookstore.in 37. Rai Sahib Ram Jawaya Kapur v. State of Punjab 38. Rupa Ashok Hurra v. Ashok Hurra 39. S.P.Sampath Kumar v. Union of India 40. Sakshi v. Union of India 41. Sheela Barse v. State of Maharashtra 42. Bodhisattwa ...

Global Freedom of Expression Union of India v. Association for ...

http://www.slic.org.in/litigation/2004-pucl-vs-union-of-india-and-others-civil-writ-petition-196-of-2001 http://probono-india.in/research-paper-detail.php?id=472 english pages tests

Who is Balveer Singh, the IPS officer accused of custodial torture …

Webthis right is the decision in S.P. Gupta Vs. Union of India [(1981) Suppl. SCC Page 87] in which this Court dealt with the issue of High Court Judges’ transfer. Bhagwati, J. observed-"The concept of an open government is the direct emanation from the right to know which seems to be implicit in the right of free speech and expression WebAug 16, 2024 · In 2002, Union of India vs. Association of Democratic Reforms was the first one that came to light in the matter of criminalisation of politics. This was followed by Peoples Union of Civil Liberties vs. Union of India, or PUCL vs. UOI in 2004, which annulled the judgement in Association of Demerocatic Reforms and provided that contestants … english painter cornish wonder

PUCL AND ANR V. UNION OF INDIA with LOKSATTA AND OTHERS V ... - VIDHISHALA

People’s Union of Civil Liberties (PUCL) v. Union of India

WebAug 11, 2015 · State of T.N 1994 6 SCC 632 (popularly known as Auto Shankar case) and People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) v. Union of India 1997 1 SCC 301. 5. All the judgments referred to above were rendered by smaller Benches of two or three Judges. 6. WebAggrieved by this decision, the Union of India had went in appeal to the Supreme Court wherein it was submitted that till suitable amendments were made in the Representation … dresses for florida weddingWebDec 7, 2024 · Earlier too, issues of identity protection and witness protection programme have been raised in various cases including NHRC v. State of Gujarat, (2009) 6 SCC 767; PUCL v. Union of India, (2004) 9 SCC 580; Zahira Habibullah Sheikh v. State of Gujarat, (2004) 4 SCC 158; Sakshi v. Union of India, (2004) 5 SCC 518; Zahira english paddock boots for girls

"WebJul 5, 2024 · PUCL has approached the Supreme Court seeking directions to ensure that individuals are not prosecuted under Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000, which the Supreme Court struck down in Shreya Singhal vs Union of India & Ors., (2015) 5 SCC 1. IFF provided legal assistance to PUCL in its application. Background " - Pucl v. union of india

Pucl v. union of india

WebApr 10, 2024 · “The justice delivery system is taking its own sweet time against an IPS officer accused of several instances of brutal custodial torture, despite multiple Supreme Court judgments,” said V. Suresh, lawyer in the Madras High Court and national general secretary, People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL), pointing to the inordinate delay in ... WebNov 11, 2024 · Union of India (SC, 1975) and R. Rajagopal v. Union of India (SC, 1994), in which the right to privacy has been held to be a constitutionally protected fundamental right and it was in this milieu that the PUCL Case bears relevance. Wiretapping and the PUCL Case. In 1990, Mr. Chandra Shekhar alleged that the Government was illegally tapping ...

Did you know?

WebIndia. Law(s) Article 14, Article 21. Bench Strength. 3 Judges. Case Type/Origin. Civil Appeal. Case Status. Overruled. Number of Opinion(s) 1. Case Citation. AIR 2008 SC 582, (2008) 1 … WebPUCL- Case Analysis:- People’s Union for Civil Liberties vs. Union of India & Anr. (NOTA Case) In Supreme Co urt of India Writ Petition (civil) No. 161 OF 2004 Citation (2013) 10 …

WebIn People’s Union of Civil Liberties (PUCL) vs. Union of India (UOI) and Anr. (18.12.1996 – SC) the honourable judge of the Supreme Court Mr. Kuldip Singh stated that “With the growth of highly sophisticated communication technology, the right to hold telephone conversation, in the privacy of one’s home or office without interference, is increasingly susceptible to … WebNov 5, 2024 · The Supreme Court of India held that Indian voters have a right under Article 19 (1) (a) of the ...

Web2. This petition-public interest-under Article 32 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the people's Union of Civil Liberties, a voluntary organisation, high lighting the incidents of … WebJul 12, 2024 · In PUCL v. Union of India, the constitutional validity of Rules 41(2), (3) and 49-O of the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961, was impugned. Both sides agreed on the fact that the combined effect of these rules was that persons who did not vote in elections were recorded (by the presiding officer) as having not voted.

WebIn Hukam Chand Shyam Lal v. Union of India,4 the SC interpreted Section 5 of the Telegraph Act. The same interpretation was followed in PUCL v. Union of India.5The court. 4 Hukam Chand Shyam Lal v. Union of India, (1976) AIR 789. 5 PUCL v. Union of India, (2002) 3 …

WebProducts and services. Our innovative products and services for learners, authors and customers are based on world-class research and are relevant, exciting and inspiring. dresses for forty year oldsThe Supreme Court of India held that Indian voters have a right under Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution to obtain information about political candidates. The People’s Union of Civil Liberties (PUCL) challenged the validity of a 1951 law, which stated that political candidates were not bound to disclose any … See more The People’s Union of Civil Liberties (PUCL) challenged the validity of Section 33B of the Representation of People Act, 1951. Section 33B provided that, … See more P. Venkatarma Reddi, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. The Supreme Court of India reiterated that Article 19(1)(a) includes the right of voters to have basic … See more dresses for florida wedding guestWebPEOPLE‘S UNION FOR CIVILLIBERTIES (PUCL) Vs. RESPONDENT: THE UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER DATE OF JUDGMENT: 18/12/1996 BENCH: KULDIP SINGH, S.SAGHIR AHMAD … english painter john crossword clueWebMay 2, 2002 · Columbia Global Freedom of Expression seeks to advance understanding of the international and national norms and institutions that best protect the free flow of … dresses for formal occasionWebMar 30, 2024 · The ADR and the People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) filed a PIL before the Delhi High Court to make the electoral process more transparent. ... (PUCL) v. Union of India and Another. dresses for full figured bodiesWebPeople’s Union for Civil Liberties. is . Jagannath v. India, where the Supreme Court of India read together Articles 21’s right to life and Ar-ticle 47’s right to nutrition and public health to establish a government obligation to ensure adequate nutrition and … dresses for french womenWebNov 2, 2024 · PUCL Statement on Threat to Judicial Independence - "We the People" of India need to stand up and assert Constitutional Values and Ethos. January 17, 2024. Issue: … dresses for fuller figured women